From: | I R Thomas <rambam@bigpond.net.au> |
To: | obligations@uwo.ca |
Date: | 08/02/2010 23:30:08 UTC |
Subject: | Re: Duty, and Breaking Eggs |
> If this poor man knew he suffered an anaphylactic reaction to eggs,
> should
> he have carried an adrenaline auto-injector with him, even if he thought
> that there would not be eggs in the food? In that case, is there an
> issue
> of contributory negligence? It would depend, I suppose, whether the
> reasonable person who suffers from anaphylaxis is like me and takes her
> adrenaline with her everywhere she goes.
Chicken eggs can immunologically cross react with salmon roe and with
chicken meat, due to the presence of alpha-livetin (allergen Gal d5) in
both. In theory, his lethal reaction could have been due to the presence
of chicken meat or fish roe in the food. I do normally tell my patients
with potentially lethal food allergies to carry their Epipen with them.
However, I have no way of knowing how many of them actually implement my
advice. In addition, I would imagine that meat and fish are forbidden
at the Gurudwara.
Dr Israel Thomas
Medical Practitioner
Sydney, Australia.